Patten not backing off ‘critical access’

In face of health care uncertainties, Holy Cross continues to seek designation

Holy Cross is located at 1397 Weimer Road in Taos.
Holy Cross is located at 1397 Weimer Road in Taos.
File photo
Posted

The future of health care became a little more uncertain last week when President Donald Trump took an executive action that is the first step in an uncharted process of repealing the Affordable Care Act. That uncertainty is causing some residents to pause as Holy Cross Hospital pursues a federal designation and more funding that comes with it.

Yet hospital CEO Bill Patten says that despite the cloudy future of Obamacare, becoming a “critical access” hospital still makes sense for Taos.

The critical access designation would change how Holy Cross gets reimbursed for patients on Medicare, the federal entitlement program for those older than 65. Medicare patients account for 40 percent of the traffic at the hospital.

Hospital officials think the facility could get nearly $1 million more a year in federal funding from the bureaucratic switch without having to significantly change up services that are offered.

During the second in a string of a community meetings Jan. 24, a number of residents suggested Holy Cross officials back off from becoming a critical access hospital until it’s more obvious what is to happen to people’s health care under the new presidential administration.

But Patten thinks it makes more sense to “take advantage of the money that’s there today.”

The United States has about 5,000 hospitals; about one-fourth of them, or 1,300, are currently critical access hospitals, Patten said. If Medicare reimbursements were significantly lowered or cut altogether, many hospitals would be forced to close. That’s a situation Patten thinks would be “politically unpalatable” for congresspeople looking at a re-election campaign in two to six years — that is, not very likely.

Hospital officials have spent the better part of a year trying to convince the hospital’s board and staff – as well as the community – that the federal designation is worth the effort. If it became financially unfeasible to operate as a critical access hospital, it would only take a month to convert back to the hospital’s current status and Medicare payment structure, Patten said.

“If the rules change, we go back,” he said.

Secondary insurance

Under the critical access designation, Medicare patients would be required to pay 20 percent of the costs of their care.

Currently, Medicare patients are billed 20 percent of what Medicare reimburses the hospital — far less than the actual costs. For a hypothetical CT scan with an actual cost of $1,000, Medicare pays Holy Cross only $300. Medicare patients pay 20 percent of that, or $60.

Under the new designation, Medicare patients would be billed $200 for a $1,000 procedure.

However, Patten said that this “20 percent rule” would apply only to those Medicare patients without a secondary insurance — a relatively small number of people. Only 12 percent of Medicare patients who use Holy Cross don’t have secondary insurance, which represents less than 5 percent of all Holy Cross patients.

Folks with Medicare Advantage plans and those with Medicaid as a secondary insurance would not be required to pay under the 20 percent rule.

Decisions

In describing the transition to critical access as a “marriage,” Patten said the hospital is past the “dating” stage and is currently “engaged,” though Holy Cross is still three to five months away from officially tying the knot.

The decision to move forward with the plan ultimately comes down to the board of the hospital, though Patten and the leadership at Holy Cross are trying to get widespread community buy-in before moving ahead.

Patten asked the board to vote on the critical access designation during the summer of 2016, but hospital employees raised concerns about the process going too fast and without proper input.

Since then, nurses, doctors and folks in the hospital’s financial and administrative offices have toured three different critical access hospitals to assess the viability, potential issues and general trajectory of making the switch.

Most employees seem to have come around to the idea of pursuing the federal designation following the site visits and various meetings to solicit feedback and address the concerns of the hospital’s staff.

Meetings with community groups in Taos, Questa and Red River are scheduled for the next two weeks. Holy Cross will make presentations, documents, handouts and video recordings of two meetings available on its website, taoshospital.org.

Comments

1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
taoshikeski

To further support John Plummer's opinion piece on this subject, I would like to offer the following:

Bill Patten obviously has little regard for the needs and concerns of both the community and the employees of Holy Cross Hospital. His comments in this article and in the previous article are devoid of realistic information about this issue, and indicate like in so many other recent instances, he has made up his mind, and he will do what ever it takes to get this done at all costs.

In regards to the 20% rule, Patten may be providing inaccurate information. While it may be true that 12% of the patients that "use" Holy Cross Hospital are not covered by secondary insurance (no documentation has been provided to support this claim), the numbers of Medicare eligible patients are increasing rapidly on an annual basis. The likelihood that all of these patients will pay premiums for secondary Medicare coverage is unlikely.

Mr. Patten's attempt at garnering community input is limited to local service organizations and virtually unadvertised town hall meetings. If the hospital truly respects our interests and opinions, they will hold more town hall meetings and market these meetings to the community in a wide-spread and appropriate advertising campaign, which has not been done.

In regards to the tours of critical access hospitals, something that has not been mentioned is how they got there. The community needs to know that Bill Patten chartered private aircraft using hospital funds (that may have come from mill levy dollars) to jet set around the region on our dime. How many employees were actually included in these tours? Is it really true that the opinion of "most" employees has "come around" ? What does that mean?

Whether he likes it or not, Bill Patten is now accountable to every property tax paying citizen in Taos County. He has been running amok in our community, and its time for Taos to take back our hospital. Its time to purge the "Donald Trump of Taos" who will continue to cram his agenda down our throats to protect QHR's management contract, whether through mill levy, critical access or the next scheme that comes down the line from their corporate offices in Tennessee.

Friday, January 27, 2017 | Report this